|
|
|
SPORTS OPINION |
| |
|
|
|
POINT AND
COUNTERPOINT

Informed commentary on current sports
issues with
Nick Freimuth & Paul Schmitt |
|
|
|
|
SPORTS POINT AND COUNTERPOINT |
|
|
Wisconsin And Marquette Are Doomed In NCAA Tournament
By Nick Freimuth DoorCountyDailyNews.com
March 19,
2008If you are looking to
win your office NCAA bracket pool, do not pick with your heart
(ESPECIALLY THIS YEAR). The Wisconsin Badgers and Marquette
Golden Eagles will not take us on the ride some may be
expecting. The Badgers do not have a consistent big time scorer
to rescue them against the run and gun teams of the PAC-10 and
ACC. If defense truly wins championships, the Badgers would have
won a National title under Dick Bennett. This year's Badgers
squad has the best offensive balance Madison has seen in over a
decade.
However, balance is not everything. When selecting your NCAA
brackets pick teams with two three and even four potential NBA
difference makers. Those teams are UCLA, UNC, Georgetown and
Kansas. I believe the UCLA Bruins are best equipped to handle
any style of play and will move on to a national championship.
The Badgers got the shaft with the number three seed, but snuck
into a relatively light regional. The Midwest has two teams that
have a legitimate chance of winning the national championship,
Kansas and Georgetown. Not the Badgers.
I played little league baseball with Wisconsin center Brian
Butch and have a routing interest. He was a great athlete then
and is still ripping it up today, but I just don’t think there
is enough around him to lift the Badgers to the Elite Eight.
Marquette is excessively inconsistent. Junior point guard
Dominic James has proved one thing this season. It was the right
decision to avoid the NBA draft last year and he should do the
same again after this season. I would not be surprised to see
the Golden Eagles go down in the first round against Kentucky.
If they do escape their first round match up, it's lights out
for them against Stanford.
Wisconsin and Marquette basketball fans don't buy into the hype
Paul Schmitt will try to sell you. He is a salesman by
profession, so I could understand if you do. Take it from the
sports reporter, Wisconsin will be knocked out in the sweet 16
and Marquette falls early. |
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Teams Will Fare Well In Tourney
By Paul Schmitt DoorCountyDailyNews.com
March 19,
2008
The Wisconsin Badgers will get to
the final four and the Marquette Golden Eagles will make it to
the sweet sixteen. That's my prediction as "March Madness"
sweeps the nation. First, Marquette. The Golden Eagles might be
the anti-badgers. They have wonderfully skilled athletes who
love to run up and down the court. The frantic pace fits
Marquette's coach Tom Crean's personality and approach. It's fun
to watch, but unfortunately the sixth seeded Golden Eagles do
not have the inside game to grind out victories deep into the
tournament. Look for Marquette to upend Kentucky and slip past
Stanford, before getting run out of gym by the Texas Longhorns.
Now the Badgers, Bo Ryan has brought a complete team concept to
Madison, reminiscent of the Dick Bennett years. In fact, it was
eight years ago when the Badgers, as an eighth seed, shocked the
basketball world by making it to the final four. Wisconsin will
play down and up to any level of competition, which is
dangerous, but they always seems to find a way to win. That's a
team that will go deep into the NCAA tournament. With six
players averaging between 7.5 and 12.5 points per game, the
Badgers have too many options for any team to shut down.
Maybe when they run into UCLA or North Carolina, the talent
might be too good to overcome. But until then, look for
Wisconsin to dominate Cal State-Fullerton, comeback and defeat a
fast-paced USC team, out-muscle the Georgetown Hoyas, and then
dismantle the surprising Vanderbilt Commodores in the Regional
final. After a hard-fought defeat against North Carolina in the
final four, the Badgers will finish 33-5, and that folks is a
great season by anyone's account.
Side note: UCLA will beat Texas in the semi-finals before
defeating North Carolina 87-82 in the finals. Get your brackets
filled-in and let the madness begin! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sports Point And
Counterpoint |
The
Timing Was Right For Favre To Walk Away
By Paul Schmitt DoorCountyDailyNews.com
March 5,
2008Well, It had to come
sooner or later. Brett Favre officially announced his retirement
from the Green Bay Packers. Cheesehead Nation is still mourning over
his surprising
decision. My heart tells me Brett has another year or two left in
him.

Why not come back and lead the Pack for another Super Bowl run? I’ll
tell you why. It’s because Brett’s heart is telling him to hang it
up now and enjoy his much-deserved retirement away from the game.
Not many players get to leave the NFL on their terms. Brett Favre is
an icon and hero to many. But he is also human. That means he knows
in HIS heart, it’s time to move on.
Sure he had a great season last year and the Packers have a roster
of very young and talented players. That’s great, but it does not
guarantee another13-3 season or NFC Championship game next year.
Especially when you consider that Favre will be 39 years old in
October. People will say he’s retiring too early. He’s still got it.
Just ONE more season. Think about it for a minute though. This is
the perfect time for Brett to ride off in the sunset. Sure his last
pass was an interception. But that won’t bother him. He always
played the game on the edge and was willing to take risks. That’s
what made him a great NFL quarterback.
He’s broken just about every conceivable passing record. He’s won a
Super Bowl. He’s been a three-time MVP. He’s a guaranteed first
ballot hall-of-famer. He’s arguably the best player ever to play in
the NFL. What else is there for him to play for? The Packers are a
stronger organization than ever and can survive a Post-Favre era.
Former first round draft pick Aaron Rodgers, who has patiently
waited in the wings, is ready for the challenge. Change is
inevitable as difficult as it may be to accept sometimes. But
Brett’s decision to retire is the right time in his mind. That’s all
that matters. He deserves a rousing send off and a collective
“thanks for the memories” from all football fans. I just hope that
it’s a final decision.
A “Michael Jordan” type of retirement would only tarnish his exit
from the game. Good-bye and good luck Brett. You deserve time with
your family and a great life after Football. It’s nice to see you
literally walk away from the game healthy, happy and content. You
did it your way, even in retirement. You’re leaving the game where
you deserve…on top! |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
#4
Leaves Game "Favre" Too Early
By Nick Freimuth DoorCountyDailyNews.com
March 5,
2008This is a sports
editorial I have dreaded writing for the past five years. Brett
Favre announced his retirement to the Green Bay Packers and the sun
has set on an amazing era in Titletown. A legend has said goodbye to
a franchise after 16 seasons in the green and gold. You just heard
Paul Schmitt say Favre should have walked away and made the right
decision.
I completely disagree. I do not want to see Favre’s last pass in the
NFL go for an interception to the New York Giants in the NFC
Championship. I want to see all legends go out on top and while
Favre had a great season that last pass will haunt him forever.
Favre left a phone message on ESPN anchor Chris Mortensen’s cell
phone stating, “I’m just tired. Physically I feel ok…I can’t
complain.” Well if you feel ok, there is no reason to walk away from
the most talented team Favre has ever played on. Those are his words
not mine. The young talent has gained valuable experience this past
season and is a favorite to get to the Super Bowl in the NFC. That
won’t be the case with Favre in retirement.
This may be selfish, but I am upset with the future Hall of Famer’s
decision. He has always been up for a challenge. In his retirement
message to Chris Mortensen he also said, "the more we won the more
stressful it got and I was always trying to top what I had done the
previous week. I felt like in coming back (for) this upcoming
season, the only way to me...that it would be successful is to go to
a Super Bowl. Anything less this year would have been disappointing
for me. To me the only way to come back and feel like I made the
right decision would be to come back and win the Super Bowl and the
odds of that are tough. That’s big shoes to fill for me and that was
a challenge that I guess I wasn’t up for. I know I can play.”
That couldn't have been Brett Favre on that message. The Favre I
know says I will beat my addiction to pain killers, I will overcome
my father's death, We can overcome my wife's battle with breast
cancer. Not, I'm afraid if I don't win a Super Bowl this year it
could be disappointing for me.
McCarthy also said in his press conference yesterday that, “In my
opinion, I think Brett could have played again at the level that he
just played this past season. The film reflects that. The statistics
reflect that. I thought he played at a very high level this year and
definitely had a lot left in his tank.” If you don’t believe me take
it from what Brett and his coaches have said over the past 24 hours.
McCarthy knows Brett can still play and what disturbs me is that
Brett knows he can still play and better than most. That is why he
should have come back for at least one more season. To again rise to
the challenge and prove to everyone that #4 could bring one more
Lombardi Trophy back to Green Bay before he rides his John Deer
tractor off into the sunset. |
| |
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
SPORTS POINT
AND COUNTERPOINT |
The Packers
Season Was An Unequivocal Success!
By Paul Schmitt
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
January 28, 2008
Take it from someone who really underestimated the Green Bay Packers
this year, the 2007 season was a huge success. The only prediction I
got right was that I figured they would lose in the NFC championship
game, but that was only after the regular season was done. A 13-3
regular season record along with a divisional playoff victory
definitely over
shadows the stinging Giant loss, even though Cheesehead nation is now scrambling to get airfare and room refunds
from Arizona. But let’s backtrack. Rewind to just two years ago. The
Packers were coming off a 4-12 season and Ted Thompson had just
fired
Mike Sherman. Brett Favre was coming off his worst season ever and
the franchise was
scratching it’s collective head wondering “how did we get here?”.
Well, after two
strong drafts and a rejuvenated Favre, the Pack is Back! And back
for years to come. Granted, everyone says if you don’t win the Super
Bowl, how can you call the season a success. I beg to differ. How
can you call a 14-4 team that has nearly half it’s roster with
players with two years or less experience unsuccessful? How can you
call a 14-4 team
that captured the hearts of “doubting Thomas’” fans with inspired
play and a never give up attitude a failure. Sure the Packers lost
is heartbreaking, but take comfort in knowing that regardless if
number four comes back next year or not, the Packers should be Super
Bowl contenders for the next few years. Mike McCarthy and Ted
Thompson will be the first to tell you that anything less than a
Super Bowl victory is NOT success. But deep down, and after Super
Bowl XLII is distant memory, EVERYONE should look back at the 2007
Green Bay Packers and proudly exclaim “THIS SEASON WAS A UNEXPECTED
AND HUGE SUCCESS!” |
|
|
|
|
The Packers
Season Should Not Be Considered A Success
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
January 28, 2008
The Packers had a season that shocked the entire football world. The
post season was a totally different picture. After exceeding
everyone’s expectations, Green Bay fans were riding high with the
assumption that they would have a shot at the undefeated Patriots in
the Super Bowl. The Packers are a more talented team than the New
York Giants. With any form of execution, the Pack should have walked
over the opponent in the NFC
championship game.
The season in my eyes is not a success because anything short of a
Super Bowl win is losing. It is like telling John Kerry that his
2004 presidential campaign was successful. He lost to Bush it was a
failure. PERIOD!
If the Packers or their fans are silly enough to think this year was
a success, than they are not asking enough of their team. Patriot
fans would tell you anything short of a Super Bowl win is an
unsuccessful season. That attitude is what will take the Packers
back to title contention. Complacency and a sense of pride for
finishing fourth in the NFL is the worst-case scenario.
I challenge all Packers fans to ask for more from their team in
2008. Losing twice to the Bears in one year is not acceptable. For
that reason alone, the season was a failure to me. You know what old
Vince Lombardi would say. "Winning isn't everything it's the only
thing." and ""The difference between a successful person and others
is not a lack of strength, not a lack of knowledge, but rather is a
lack of will." The Packers did not will themselves to Super Bowl
XLII, thus the season was not a success.
Paulie, I understand your editorial opinions on the Packers have
been negative all season and this is the first shot I'm taking at
the green and gold since the pre-season, but bandwagon jumping is
usually reserved for Vikings, Lions and Cowboys fans. |
|
|
|
|
How
Far Will The Packers Go?
By Paul Schmitt
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
January 6, 2008
Okay, I admit it. I was
dead wrong on the Packers this year. They proved me and a lot of
other people wrong. I thought the Packers would be competitive and
win maybe seven or eight games this year. But THIRTEEN? Wow,
what a year! I'm sure glad I was wrong in this case.
But the playoffs are a whole different animal. Let me
pull out my ole' "cracked" crystal ball this time. Well, I can't see
much. It's all hazy and a fuzzy. That's right it's
Mid-January at snowy and cold Lambeau Field. It's the NFC divisional
championship...Packers versus the Buccaneers.
Brett Favre throws for three touchdowns and Ryan Grant
rushes for 140 yards as the Pack tame the Bucs 31-20.
Now my crystal ball clears for the moment. Ah yes, it's sunny Texas
Stadium in Dallas on January 20. The Cowboys are hosting the Packers
in the NFC championship game. The Packers lead early 14-3, but Tony
Romo hooks up with Terrell Owens twice in the fourth quarter and
Dallas
nips the Pack 31-27 to go to Super Bowl XLII (where they get
destroyed by the New England Patriots 48-17). My
crystal ball now goes blank. But don't fear Packer fans, I caught a
glimpse of Super Bowl XLIII. The Vince Lombardi Trophy comes home to
Green Bay as Brett Favre hoists the trophy up high and tearfully
announces his retirement at the post-game celebration! |
|
|
|
|
How Far Will The Packers Go?
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
January 05, 2008
The Green Bay Packers are
not only in the playoffs but are favorites to play in the NFC
Championship game. That comes as a surprise to many. At the
beginning of the season, nobody thought this team could win 13 games
and stroll into the playoffs with a first round bye. In an earlier
"Sports Point and Counterpoint" Paul Schmitt and I bantered about
the Packers playoffs hopes. I firmly believed after a (6-1) start in
October, Green Bay would continue their winning ways. The last
sentence of my earlier editorial was, "I'm buying my tickets to the
NFC Championship game without a doubt." I still believe that is
going to happen.
The Packers offense will be able to handle any of the defenses they
may face next Saturday. The Seattle Seahawks are the likely
opponents and Mike McCarthy will have his team ready to play. The
only thing that worries me when Seattle and Green Bay match up is
the Holmgren factor. There is not a single person in the NFL that
knows Brett Favre better than the former leader of the Pack Mike
Holmgren.
Despite the potential for the second round game in Lambeau to be a
trap game, I believe the Packers are Super Bowl bound. I cannot
believe I just said it but Super Bowl XLII will feature a team led
by Brett Favre. Glendale, Arizona will be filled with cheese heads
in disbelief.
The Packers will be there for three simple reasons.
1) BRETT FAVRE - The fearless quarterback has managed the offense
better than ever. He set a career record for completion percentage
and has the weapons to make him feel confident every time he drops
back to pass. Favre is throwing fewer interceptions and compelling
his team to play to their ability and beyond.
2) MIKE MCCARTHY - I believe McCarthy should be awarded with Coach
of the Year honors. He worked with less and got more out of his team
than any other coach in the league. His emphasis on the fundamentals
will propel this team to a Super Bowl.
3) DEFENSE - If defense wins championships, Green Bay has a chance.
The Packers have great run-stopping ability led by Ryan Pickett up
front. Defensive ends Aaron Kampman, Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila and Cullen
Jenkins play run and pass extremely well. Linebackers Nick Barnett,
A.J. Hawk and Brady Poppinga are the hungriest group of young
players at the position. Finally, Al Harris, Charles Woodson and
Nick Collins in the secondary can match up with the best wide
receivers in the game.
It's as easy as 1-2-3. The Packers will be in Super Bowl XLII. |
|
|
|
|
PRO BOWL is way
over-rated
By Paul Schmitt
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
December 22, 2007
Although the Green Bay Packers deserved to have more participants in
this year’s Pro Bowl than four, the whole concept of having an
all-star game AFTER the regular season is a joke. The National
Football League should scrap the meaningless Pro Bowl and just have
the coaches in the league vote on the All-Pro teams from each
conference. That’s it. Forget about a game that is played a week
after the Super Bowl in which most of the superstars take a pass or
go through the motions. Forget about a game that is the most boring
of the year. They should call it the “Snore Bowl”. Forget about a
game that has NEVER been for the fans, just a reward for the players
who get a trip to Hawaii. But knowing the NFL, it’ll probably
continue this innocuous tradition for the next decade or two. In the
meantime, I’m not going to lose any sleep over the Pro Bowl
selections, even though the Cowboys received 11 selections and the
Vikings placed 7 starters in the game. In the meantime, the Packers
should focus on the upcoming play-offs and worry about the only
“Bowl” that matters, the Super Bowl. If individual recognition is
important to the Packers and fans, the Pro Bowl snubs should only
ensure that Mike McCarthy is the “NFL Coach of the Year”. Then
again, sportswriters decide that award and you know what they know
about football! |
|
|
|
|
Pro Bowl Is
Genius
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
December 22, 2007
Wooooah Mr. Schmitt! You exude passion on this topic and that is
spectacular. Take a second, sit back and think this through
logically. You know, irrational decisions can be made when you don’t
think something through.
The Pro Bowl is about one thing and one thing only…MONEY. The NFL
played a regular season in London this year. A home game was taken
away from the New York Giants when they played Miami at Wembley
Stadium. The game was held to raise awareness for the league in a
global light.
Hawaii hosts the annual all-star game in the NFL and people there
love the sport. Why? Because thousands of NFL fans from the
contiguous United States travel to the island and spend money.
The Pro Bowl is an excellent idea for the league. It is a chance for
players to fraternize, plead their case as to why another star
should consider his team and give players more face recognition.
The game is more about the sideline interviews than the product on
the field. It is a marketing masterpiece and has gone over well.
As for the Packers not receiving equal representation in the game
compared to the Dallas Cowboys, that is a mockery. Nick Barnett is
the best middle linebacker in the NFC this year and somehow he was
bypassed for two players that play on far worse teams. Greg Jennings
is second in the NFC in touchdown catches and has a higher average
reception total than teammate Donald Driver.
You could make serious cases for Charles Woodson, Mark Tauscher,
Nick Collins, Ryan Grant, Donald Lee and Scott Wells too.
The voting is based on name recognition and the Packers lack in that
category. That’s what happens when a team has the youngest roster in
the league. Players and fans have been unable to familiarize
themselves with the names on the most surprising team in the league.
The positive that can and I believe will come from the Packers being
slighted in the Pro Bowl is ideal. Green Bay players have a bigger
chip on their shoulder because of the Pro Bowl balloting results and
will play that way for the rest of the season and into the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
Bucks Will Miss
The Playoffs Again
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
November 7, 2007
The Milwaukee
Bucks will be a non-factor in the NBA Eastern Division again this
season. The 2007-2008 season is just under way and already the Bucks
have disappointed. Their lack of defensive intensity is
disheartening for a basketball purist, who believes defense is the
key to success. In addition, I am a firm believer that if your team
does not pass the ball extremely well, you will fail to outscore
your opponent.
Michael Redd will need to average 45 points per game this season for
Milwaukee to be in the race for a playoff spot. Unfortunately, he is
the only player that has proven that he can score on a nightly
basis. Andrew Bogut, Charlie Villanueva, Desmond Mason, Charlie Bell
and Mo Williams all bring something unique to the table but have not
proven anything at the NBA level.
Yi Jianlian will not live up to the hype the Chinese media has
pumped in to Milwaukee's sails. He may turn into a solid sixth man
some day. I believe the Bucks have been forced into staring him
because of his holdout earlier this year. It is strictly my belief
that the Chinese Basketball Association put a clause in the contract
that forces Bucks Coach Larry Krystkowiak to start him and ensure
that he plays at least 60% of the minutes. With that as a possible
stipulation to signing Yi, the Bucks will come up short on the
scoreboard and in the standings.
In order to win in the Eastern Conference, teams need solid and
consistent play in the post. Milwaukee lacks strong, big-bodied post
players that can mash with other power forwards and centers in the
East.
The final reason why I believe the Bucks will be a pretender this
season is youth. No one on the Milwaukee squad has any experience
with winning. They say winning breeds winning and losing breeds
losing. Well, the 2007 Bucks have all experienced more of the
ladder. This team is missing a proven winner and unless Kareem Abdul
Jabbar or Oscar Robertson decide to dawn the Buck's uniforms again,
Milwaukee is destine for failure. |
|
|
|
|
Milwaukee Bucks
Will Contend This Year
By Paul Schmitt
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
November 7, 2007
I believe this is the year the
Milwaukee Bucks make a run in the NBA Eastern
Conference. After a disappointing 2006-07 campaign, which saw the
Bucks win finish
Dead last in the central with a 28-54, a healthy and deep roster
could bode well for a
Run into the playoffs.
The Bucks were playing well up to January last year when a string of
debilitating
Injuries left only a shell of the original starting unit to play out
the season.
Season ending injuries to Bobby Simmons, Charlie Villanueva, Michael
Redd and Andrew Bogart doomed the Bucks to a pitiful finish.
Now fast-forward to this year. A frontcourt featuring a healthy
Bobby Simmons, the seven-foot Chinese phenom Yi Jianlian and a more
determined and stronger Andrew Bogut in the middle, gives the Bucks
a formidable threesome. Throw in the return of
Desmond Mason, a healthy Villanueva and Dan “the energizer bunny”
Gadzuric,
And the Bucks have the depth to withstand an injury or two during
the season.
In the Backcourt, Moe Williams and perennial All-Star Michael Redd
gives the Bucks
one of the best backcourts in the league. Charlie Bell returns as
the back up at both guard
positions and offers experience and defense.
Speaking of defense, the biggest addition to the Bucks this year may
not be a player.
Larry Krystkowiak who coached the final month and half last year,
brings a no-nonsense,
In-your-face defensive philosophy. His positive, yet firm, hands-on
approach will reflect well on this young but relatively experienced
team. Couple that with a weak Eastern Conference which has no clear
cut favorite, and you have a recipe for the Bucks to make some noise
this year.
The Bucks went to the playoffs two years ago and did beat the
soon-to-be Champion Pistons in one game, which was more than any
other Eastern team did. Look for the Bucks to make a return trip and
a possible run deep into the playoffs. I’m not saying they’ll win it
all, but a 45-50 win season is not unrealistic. Good News sports
fans! That would mean that all three professional teams in Wisconsin
would post winning records in the last year. And it’s been a while
since we could say that. |
|
|
|
|
Packers Too
Young To Be A Contender
By Paul Schmitt
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
October 31, 2007
I know this is going to sound like I
jumped off the bandwagon, or never
was on it to begin with, but The Green Bay Packers cannot be taken
serious as a contender in the NFC this year. It’s way to early to
start talking
playoffs and Super Bowl. Granted, the Packers have made substantial
strides in improving from the last couple mediocre seasons. But with
no running game in
sight and a defense that has yet to shut down any teams this year,
the Packers are
still a year or two away from being a true contender. With 25
players on the roster
having less than two years of NFL experience, the Packers are just
too young and inexperienced. Veteran teams like the Cowboys, Bears
and even the Giants are the teams
that will be there in the end.
Now it’s true the Packers have beaten some good teams, like the
Chargers and Giants.
but that came early in the year when those teams were struggling.
Even the Philadelphia
opening game victory, looks less impressive now that the Eagles are
not the contender people thought they were.
Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy should be complemented for getting
the most out of
their roster, but it’s far too early to start printing play-off
tickets and talking about a return to the Super Bowl. Thompson had a
plan when he came in and the Packers are on schedule, it just won’t
be this year.
Due to free agency and the nature of the business, no teams have
great depth. But the
Packers lack depth at key positions. Namely, the offensive line,
defensive back field and
Linebackers. If, and it’s a big if, the Packers stay healthy, they
could prove me wrong.
I just wouldn’t bet on it.
Another thing going against the Pack is their schedule. Four of
their final six games are on the road. Winning in December is
crucial for a play-off run and a lot of tough road games will make
it that more difficult. Late season games at Dallas, at Detroit and
at Chicago may be more than these young Packers can handle.
If I have one message to Packer fans in Packerland, it’s to enjoy
the current ride and be excited for the future. Just don’t expect
too much, too soon. The Packers are still a year or two away from
contending. Just ask the Milwaukee Brewers. |
| |
|
|
Packers Are
Playoff Bound
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
October 31, 2007
The Green Bay
Packers are one of three teams that have a legitimate shot at
representing the NFC in the Super Bowl. The 2007 team is a running
back away from being the favored franchise in the conference and
Brett Favre makes up for that deficiency pretty well. The (6-1)
start is all cheese heads need to look at for proof that the Packers
are for real and will be plying in the NFC Championship. The last
time Green Bay had this kind of start they hosted a first round
playoff game. In 1996, their (6-1) start ended with a Super Bowl
victory.
Paul Schmitt, I'm not sure about your Packer-backer status anymore.
You are tying to tell me that this team has a difficult schedule
down the stretch. That is simply not the case. The Oakland Raiders,
winless St. Louis Rams and Chicago Bears still loom on the horizon.
There is not a scenario that plays out where the Packers do not make
the playoffs, in my opinion. I know I may have just jinxed
Wisconsin's team, but besides the Cowboys and Panthers, no
teams scare me.
Green
Bay's
shutdown defense led by Charles Woodson, Al Harris, Nick Barnett and
Aaron Kampman is all the proof you need that this team will be there
past the first round of the playoffs. The old saying "defenses win
championships" is absolutely true in the NFL. Their 19-13 win over
Denver at Invesco Field was all the evidence that this team can play
on the road, in a tight game, faced with adversity and still come
out with the win.
The Packers are here!
Wisconsinites stand up and be proud of the product on the field. The
national media has not jumped on the Packer bandwagon yet because of
a bunch of young unknown athletes. Green Bay has the best record in
the NFC. They should be favored in every game for the rest of the
season. The only game that the Packers will be underdogs is the
November 29 game at Dallas. If Green Bay pulls off that game, I'm
buying my tickets to the NFC Championship game without a doubt. |
| |
| |
Packers Player To
Watch In 2007 - Clowney
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
June 28, 2007
The Green Bay Packers have been without a solid kickoff
return game since Allan Rossum departed for the Atlanta
Falcons in 2000. Antonio Chatman, Andrae Thurman, Ahmad
Carroll, Najeh Davenport and the worst experiment Cory
Rodgers have all been busts during their time at return
specialist.
The biggest issue with all of the aforementioned is their
willingness to run out of bounds. Walter Payton's style of
play is sorely missed in the NFL and especially in the Green
Bay Packers kick off return game. The team needs a player
that is not afraid to battle for an extra yard on a return
and elect to turn it up field instead of taking the easy way
out.
Green Bay's 5th round selection, David Clowney could turn
out to be one of the team's best decisions of the 2007
draft. Clowney has shown tremendous speed and the mentality
of a hardnosed ball player. The rookie out of Virginia Tech
commented during the team's recent OTA's that he does not
shy away from contact and will be that player that fights
for additional yardage to put his team in the best field
position possible.
(Audio
Here)
Of the results given during the NFL Network’s broadcast of
the Combine, Clowney recorded the fifth fastest time in the
40 yard dash at 4.36 seconds. The wide receiver clocked a 40
time of 4.28 at Virginia Tech and said he is still capable
of running that time.
At the 157th overall selection in the draft the Packers got
a steal in Clowney. The young man did not anticipate falling
out of the top three rounds and many projections had him
going as high as round two.
Clowney has also been impressive throughout mini-camp and
OTA's. He showcased his speed returning kicks last week and
has great hands. The rookie has a legitimate chance to start
the season as the Packers return specialist and work his way
into the number three receiver role.
David Clowney may not be a name that Packers fans are
familiar with now, but before long green and gold
enthusiasts will be excited about the potential he brings to
the kick return game and the receiving core. |
| |
| |
Packers Player To
Watch In 2007 - Harris
By Brian Sonnenberg
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
June 28, 2007
Packers May Have Found A Gem In The Seventh
Each season, at least one player typically surprises
Green Bay Packer fans, by not only making the team, but also
performing well on the field.
Without a huge splash in free agency, Green Bay’s breakout
player will derive from the 2007 draft class.
You’d have to look to the seventh round to find this year’s
surprising performer: Rutgers Tight End Clark Harris.
Draft experts predict Harris will only find work as a
back-up tightend. Despite his large frame, (6-5, 251),
pundents believe his blocking and running deficiencies
prevent him from becoming a dynamic player.
With those negatives in mind, let’s discover why he could
raise some eyebrows this season.
Blocking is technique. He clearly has the frame to produce
as a run blocker; therefore, it’s a matter of coaching him
the proper technique to handle a defensive end.
After overcoming his major flaw, his pass catching abilities
make him a great fit in the West Coast Offense. He had
consistent production at Rutgers, and as a sophomore
recorded 53 receptions, for 725 yards and five touchdowns.
Before you rag on Rutgers not being a big-time football
school, remember how they were in the running for a BCS bid
last year until late season losses to Cincinnati and West
Virginia derailed that dream.
Much like Mark Chmura (6-5, 248), Harris does not possess
breakaway speed; however, Chmura had an incredibly
productive career as a stable pass-catcher. In fact, fans
labeled Chmura as Favre’s security blanket. That’s a wrinkle
in the offense that clearly has been missing. A wrinkle
Harris could provide this season.
With Bubba Franks having a decidedly unproductive year at
tight end last season, there is no time like the present for
Harris to prove he belongs on the field. |
| |
| |
What A Blessing At
Six
By Brian Sonnenberg
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
June 11, 2007
With the sixth overall pick in the 2007 NBA Draft,
the Milwaukee Bucks select Mike Conley Jr, guard, Ohio
State.Although it seems a disappointment, dropping from
probable third to definite sixth, the Bucks will get a
coveted, underrated and much-needed player in the draft.
Milwaukee desperately needs a true point guard, so let’s
imagine Milwaukee did select third overall. General Manager
Larry Harris could not justify Conley at number three. The
only other legitimate, big-time point guard prospect in the
draft, Acie Law from Texas A&M, is nowhere near a top-five
pick.
Therefore, at number three, Milwaukee ignores needs and
selects a forward/center. The sixth pick forces and allows
the Bucks to look at other positions in the draft.
Plus, if Milwaukee truly believes the unfortunate
injuries caused a horrendous year, then we must assume
they’ll have plenty returning at forward/center. Coming off
injuries, Charlie Villanueva, Andrew Bogut and Bobby Simmons
should provide enough inside presence.
With T.J. Ford already gone and Mo Williams possibly
finished, Conley would fit perfectly. He’s quick and smart
with great vision. More importantly, he doesn’t need the
spotlight. Playing with Oden, Conley was Robin to Oden’s
Batman. As a point guard, that mentality will lift a team a
long way. Rather than individual statistics, Conley would
prefer to win games and make those around him better.
Consider other first round forward taken by Milwaukee:
Danny Fortson, Robert Traylor, Marcus Haislip and Vin Baker.
Perhaps it’s a blessing Milwaukee slipped to six and can
ponder other options.
My message to Milwaukee: Invest in Andrew Bogut and
Michael Redd by finally surrounding them with a legitimate,
potential Hall-of-Fame point guard. |
| |
| |
Bucks Need Draft Pick
To Produce
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
June 11, 2007
Mike Conoley Jr. is only 19 years old and will not
be able to lead an NBA team right away. The Milwaukee Bucks
need a player that has experience, leadership skills and a
positive attitude at the point guard position.
Conoley Jr. was a package deal with Greg Oden coming out
of high school and a number of Division 1 schools rejected
the point guard because of his unimpressive athletic ability
and average basketball IQ.
The 2007 draft will give Milwaukee the opportunity to
make their front court one of the most lethal in the Eastern
Conference. Corey Brewer will be the sixth pick in the
draft.
The 21 year old from Florida will be the perfect
chemistry player for the small market team. Brewer is a
great story. Instead of heading for the NBA draft after a
stellar sophomore season and a National championship, Brewer
decided to further develop his game at the collegiate level.
The young man did the right thing!
Brewer and his teammates Al Horford and Joakim Noah
played the team game and will all make positive impacts on
their future NBA teams.
Brewer will play the team game, make the extra pass to
set up Michael Redd and rebound with the best of them. He
knows how to win and will bring that experience and
confidence into a locker room that needs a lift. The junior
from Florida is 6'9" and has great foot-speed. His desire
will make him an exceptional defender at the next level.
If the Bucks pull the trigger on the Most Outstanding
Player of the 2007 NCAA Tournament Final Four they will
create match up problems for nearly every team in the East.
Andrew Bogut is 7' and Charlie Villanueva is 6'11".
Mo Williams averaged 17.3 points per game, 4.80 rebounds
per game and 6.1 assists per game last year for the Bucks.
2007 was Williams third year in the NBA and he will only get
better. Give him a chance to grow and mold with the other
current Bucks and draft a guy with a positive attitude that
will make the team better. Corey Brewer is the logical pick
for the Bucks with the number six overall spot in this
year's draft. |
| |
| |
The Brewers Are World
Series Contenders
By Brian Sonnenberg
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
May 16, 2007
On the 25th Anniversary of the 1982 Milwaukee World
Series team, the 2007 Brewers show signs of
following in some pretty magical footsteps.
The number one ingredient needed to make a deep
playoff run is pitching. The 1982 Brewers featured
four players with double-digit victories. Those four
starting pitchers combined for 58 wins and 34
losses.
The 2007 Brewers legitimately possess four starters
who could surpass that mark. Ben Sheets, Jeff Suppan,
Chris Capuano and Dave Bush are 16-9 not to mention
Claudio Vargas with an unblemished 3-0 record.
In 1982, Rollie Fingers, a current Hall-of-Famer,
closed 29 games for the Brewers. Similarly, the
current Brewers have a lights-out Francisco Cordero,
who has already saved 15 games.
More comparisons arise between two shortstops, Robin
Yount, and J.J. Hardy. Yount hit over 30 homeruns
and 100 RBIs in 1982. Hardy could reach that homerun
mark by the All-Star Break.
Despite some comparisons between key players, one
distinct difference remains. Yount was eight years
into a Hall-of-Fame career in 1982. Paul Molitor was
the second-best rookie in 1978, and Fingers was
already a proven star.
The 2007 Brewers are largely an untested group.
However, looking at the National League, Milwaukee
could get a favorable draw into of the playoffs.
The NL East will most likely produce the best record
and the Wild Card. That means New York and Atlanta
will tangle in the first round thus eliminating one
team the Brewers would struggle to beat.
Then Milwaukee draws a weaker NL West team like Los
Angeles giving them a more favorable first round.
Realize the it’s a long season, but also realize the
2007 Brewers closely resemble the 1982 Brewers.
Comparisons aren’t worth more than paper trails, but
it shows Milwaukee could be on the path to another
magical season. |
| |
| |
Bandwagon Fans Need To
Take A Step Back
By Nick Freimuth
DoorCountyDailyNews.com
May 16, 2007
"Fair weather" Milwaukee Brewers fans are crawling
out from the woodworks. Thoughts of 1982 are dancing
in optimist’s heads and they are way out of line.
The Milwaukee Brewers are not going to make a run at
the World Series this season. This team's upside is
phenomenal, but they are too green to win it all
this soon.
The young core of super stars is exciting to watch.
The way Prince Fielder pumps his fists and claps his
hands after a deep smash into the right field
bleachers is refreshing. Ben Sheets seems to have a
way to keep the players in the dugout lose. Finally,
J.J. Hardy 's blue-collar worker like attitude is
great to see.
With all of that said, this team does not know how
to win big games. Examine the series against the
Mets to illustrate the Brewers shortcomings. The ace
pitcher Chris Capuano was knocked around like a rag
doll and the bats disappear when the real contenders
come to play.
The National League is so much weaker than the
American League that the Brewers look like a
dominant team. Unfortunately, the NL has not started
playing baseball yet. The scenario is great for
Brewers fans, and why not enjoy the national
publicity while it is here.
Milwaukee will start to fade because their young
core cannot keep this current pace the entire
season. The starting rotation will start to waiver
soon and the lack of a dominant lefty in the bullpen
will prove costly down the stretch.
Wisconsin sports lovers have a great opportunity to
cheer for a team that is fun to watch. Just don't
get your hopes up, because this team will not bring
home the hardware that some fans are already
mentioning - A World Series trophy. |
|
|
|
Green Bay's Draft Puzzling At
Best
By Brian Sonnenberg DoorCountyDailyNews.com
May 9, 2007
The draft is the proverbial bedroom mirror. It forces a team
to assess its weaknesses and identify holes. At some point
in each off-season, a team must fill those weaknesses. Ted
Thompson's strategy of drafting the best player available is
fine as long as needs are met through free agency.
This off-season Green Bay neglected to fill obvious holes.
However, Thompson still drafted “the best player available."
you can’t afford that luxury when nothing was done through
free agency to address other huge needs.
Green Bay selected Justin Harrell in the first round. Very
simply, Harrell wasn’t even the best player available at 16.
Brady Quinn was definitively the best value.
Maybe Thompson really believes in Aaron Rodgers. Ok. Fine.
What about Robert Meachem, Dwayne Bowe, Leon Hall or Reggie
Nelson?
Harrell, largely regarded as a second round talent,
struggled to overcome injuries at Tennessee. Question marks
surround whether he will withstand the rigors of an NFL
season.
Following the first round, in what can only be described as
a pathetic attempt to fill needs, Green Bay selected a
running back with bad shoulders (Brandon Jackson), a slow
wide receiver (James Jones) and a speedy wide receiver who
doesn’t run great routes (David Clowney).
The exact same issues remain for Green Bay. Ahman Green left
a huge hole at running back. Green Bay did nothing to
address it. Brett Favre still lacks a dynamic tight end to
stretch the middle of the field. Green Bay did nothing to
address it. At wide receiver, Favre possesses capable
players at his disposal; however, none of them are
gamebreakers. Predictably, Green Bay did nothing to address
it.
At what point is it detrimental to disregard glaring holes
and simply select the best player available? Thompson
preaches building through the draft. Unfortunately, I have
no idea what Green Bay is building. |
|
|
|
|
Give Draft Picks A Chance
By Brian Sonnenberg DoorCountyDailyNews.com
May 9, 2007
Before we hang Packers General Manager Ted Thompson, lets remember what fans were thinking after the 2006
draft. Thompson hit on a sure-fire number five pick in A.J.
Hawk. After that people were confused by the franchise’s
decision to pick Daryn College, Jason Spitz and Tony Moll.
The three turned out to be reliable and are now viewed as
the corner stones of Green Bay’s offensive line.
The 2007 draft was filled with offensive expectations but
with the number 16 selection defensive tackle Justin Harrell
was taken. Ted Thompson said Harrell was the best player
left on their draft board so he went with his motto, “don’t’
fill a need, draft the best talent available.”
The Packers need was obviously a running back, wide receiver
or tight end. While the Packers did not address those needs
in the first round, at least the brain trust stood by their
motto. Coaches and GM’s that flip flop on their word are
most times unsuccessful. So give this staff credit for
standing by their word.
Donald Driver and Greg Jennings made a nice receiving tandem
last season. Jennings, barring the sophomore slump, will
take another step forward. The forgotten intangible in the
equation is Robert Ferguson. He has been disappointing in a
word to this point in his career, but Coach Mike McCarthy
and his staff have big plans for the underachieving
possession receiver.
Keyshawn Johnson was cut by the Carolina Panthers last week.
He could be a possible weapon added into the equation.
Thompson’s track record indicates the move is a long shot,
but it's worth mentioning.
Green Bay’s second round draft pick Brandon Jackson from the
University of Nebraska will surprise many in the next three
years. He may not be an impact player in his rookie season,
but I believe he has the intangibles that make him a durable
back in the NFL.
James Jones could be a Greg Jennings
repeat. Jones provides the Pack with much needed size and
provides a great target for Favre. If he can gel with Favre this could be a
difference maker by week 5 in 2007.
The jury is out on this year’s draft. Be patient Packer fans
and let the most recent draft class prove themselves before
we call them losers. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
| |
|
|